Showing posts with label intertextuality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label intertextuality. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Intertextuality The Lion King



When I think of intertextuality I instantly think of the relationship between Disney's, The Lion King and Shakespeare's, Hamlet.  The two texts share similar characters and moments. Intertextuality is the interaction between two different texts, a text being anything that can be read or interpreted. So, intertextuality would be a new text that has been influenced by an older text. What is the purpose of intertextuality? Why would an author want to incorporate someone else's ideas in his/her own work? Bringing successful elements of one text into another has the potential to enhance the reader's interest and connection with the work since it is familiar and even ironic.
So, in The Lion King Simba born to Sarabi and Mufasa is the prince of the Pride Lands, just like prince Hamlet is the prince of Denmark. The moment where I personally saw the closest connection between the two stories, is when Scar murders his brother Mufasa hoping to one day be in power of the Pride Lands just like when Claudius murders his brother King Hamlet succeeding to the throne of Denmark. Throughout both stories the princes take revenge on their uncle.
Since I saw the movie The Lion King before reading Hamlet, it made reading Hamlet more enjoyable and thrilling since I could relate it to a childhood movie. It also made me value The Lion King more since it is based off of such an important piece of literature.

The Intertextuality of Religious Scriptures


Website for image

This idea may seem odd, or far-fetched to a degree, but with further elaboration, I’m sure you will understand my point. The Judeo-Christian Bible and all of the shared and unshared beliefs that stem from it, try to define how one should live, what comes after life, and how we all got here in the first place.  In terms of intertextuality and honing in on substantial spiritual answers, one must juxtapose the Judeo-Christian traditions with those of the East Asians cultures. In Buddhism, for example, it is a commonly held belief that Heaven and Hell do exist. This is a Christian belief. In Buddhism, however, death on earth may lead to life in Hell. Death in Hell may lead back to Earth, or up to heaven. This is all part of what Buddhists call the karmic cycle. When one is in Heaven or Hell, karma is paid off or settled. If you have good karma, you go to heaven, die, and pay off bad karma in hell, return to the Earth realm to generate more good or bad karma, or in some rare cases, lifted up to a Pure Land governed by a bodhisattva. This “angel”, if you will, governs its own paradise that one has prayed to be admitted to throughout their lifetime. In Christianity you lead a "good" life, and hope to be raptured, or lifted up to Heaven to reside with God and Jesus. Similar. Yet, Different. 
Website for image
            If one truly looks at these concepts and compares them to Western theology, we can find similarities and differences that, in my mind, help clarify our own personal beliefs. Christians believe that if you lead a “proper” or “good” life, as dictated by the New Testament and Jesus Christ, you will be raptured into heaven and live in paradise with God and Jesus. A “good” Christian goes to church constantly, is religious in the household, and observes the Ten Commandments and other general rules and practices of the religion. Well, in Buddhism, you follow the eight-fold, which is surprisingly similar. Why is this important? It is important because a Christian in Iowa and a Buddhist in Japan are both trying to ensure that they will reside in Heaven. For a Christian, they believe they will reside with God and Jesus. For a Buddhist it is a little more complicated. They can reside in Heaven, or pray enough to a certain bodhisattva and enter a specific Pure Land. One could say that Jesus is like a bodhisattva, for he is divine and resides in a Heaven, except that he resides in one general heaven with “God.”
            The point I am trying to illustrate here is that all sacred religious texts deal with similar issues; sometimes in very similar ways. In other cases, most religions differ greatly on issues.  We cannot, however, ignore the commonalties that do exist within these religions.
            Another eye opening example can be found between Judaism and Buddhism. Observant Jews do not do “work” on the Sabbath. They have “Shabbat Clocks” and other gadgets of the sort that turn on lights, turn off fans, operate microwaves, open doors, and so on, during the Sabbath time. For Buddhism, an average westerner would say, “all they do is sit around meditating.” This of course, is false. In the Buddhist monastic tradition meditation is critical, but so is action. Monks are dedicated to prayer, routine, and action. So too are the observant Jews, yet they have their own way of being observant. Both place heavy value on routine or the “right” way of life (as do Christians and Hindus) and both do it in a different way.
Website for image
          Intertextuality is essential to understanding all world religions, and developing a personal approach to spirituality. I believe that in this modern age, with all the tools that we posses, it is almost               disgraceful to ignore the traditions and beliefs around us. We must study every facet of the human belief system, in order to better understand what brings each one of us a sense of security and faith. 

Intertextuality: Cinderella


Intertextuality plays an important role in literature as it helps readers compare two texts.  The texts can vary from having the same theme and details, to having only one thing in common that can be pulled out and compared.  Overtime, numerous amounts of texts begin to carry out similar ideas and these can easily be compared.  When comparing the texts, there seems to be a conversation going on between the two.

Cinderella and Prince Charming
When I was a little girl I grew up watching Disney’s Cinderella.  As the years went by I began to notice other versions of the same movie, some with direct similarities, and others with a completely different plot.  My favorite version was A Cinderella Story starring Hilary Duff.  It was the same story set in a modern time period; similar to the things we are used to seeing.  When I began to learn more about myths and fairytales, I came to find out that this same story was being told a long, long time ago, although it did not have such a happy ending in the original versions.

By having different versions of the same text, the audience is able to choose what they like and do not like, sort of creating their own story.  Also, having various versions can make understanding the text more interesting when it is compared.  The story of Cinderella will stick with me forever, all of the details and characters, and no matter what text I get into in the future, having this solid background helps in every way.  I’ll always have something to compare new texts to.

If I were to choose another text to compare Cinderella to it would be The Princess Diaries.  In the beginning of the two stories, the main characters start off as average girls who are not given much attention as they live their daily lives.  Throughout the middle they go through extreme makeovers making them more noticeable, and at the end both girls become princesses and everyone loves them.  Seeing the magic appear in both stories makes me so happy!  It’s always a nice and motivating idea to think about, reminding the audience that anything is possible.